XOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -173.26% compared to Xos's net margin of 5.54%. Xos's return on equity of -104.41% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.91%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.376%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Xos's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.55x versus 0.46x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of -173.26% compared to Xos's net margin of 4.85%. Xos's return on equity of -104.41% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.91%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $108.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.58%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.861%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Xos's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 10.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.55x versus 0.62x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of -173.26% compared to Xos's net margin of 6.79%. Xos's return on equity of -104.41% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.91%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $101.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.626%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Xos's net income of -$10.2M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.55x versus 1.53x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of -173.26% compared to Xos's net margin of -0.7%. Xos's return on equity of -104.41% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.91%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.76%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than The Shyft Group.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.927, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.705%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $204.6M. Xos's net income of -$10.2M is lower than The Shyft Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is 1,049.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.55x versus 0.46x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.