OBDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 92.26% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 99.99%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 10.34% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $15.59, signalling upside risk potential of 4.29%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.92 which suggests that it could fall by -2.13%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.355%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 110.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $263M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $242.6M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 8.59x versus 8.48x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 92.26% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 91.13%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 10.34% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $15.59, signalling upside risk potential of 4.29%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could fall by -0.46%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.101%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 110.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $263M, which are larger than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $242.6M is higher than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 8.59x versus 12.68x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 92.26% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 95.41%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 10.34% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $15.59, signalling upside risk potential of 4.29%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.263%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 110.18% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $263M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $242.6M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 8.59x versus 10.02x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 92.26% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 90.2%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 10.34% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $15.59, signalling upside risk potential of 4.29%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -3.61%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.445%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 110.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $263M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $242.6M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 112.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 8.59x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.