GAIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 91.13%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.3%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.33%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.101%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.81%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 8.40x versus 12.59x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 96.47%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 18.67%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.3%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $26.40 which suggests that it could fall by -7.43%. Given that Gladstone Capital has more downside risk than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.475%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.81%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 6.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $9M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 7.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 8.40x versus 7.08x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 95.41%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.3%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.43%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.263%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.81%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 8.40x versus 9.87x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 90.2%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.3%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.27%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has more downside risk than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.445%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.81%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 110.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 8.40x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.