NWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 17.04%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $136.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 46.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.768%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are larger than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $298.7M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is higher than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 22.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.29x versus 3.23x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Jersey Resources has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 22.38%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat New Jersey Resources's return on equity of 18.35%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand New Jersey Resources has an analysts' consensus of $53.71 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than New Jersey Resources, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than New Jersey Resources.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 46.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.275%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. New Jersey Resources offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. New Jersey Resources pays out 56.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are smaller than New Jersey Resources quarterly revenues of $913M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is lower than New Jersey Resources's net income of $204.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while New Jersey Resources's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.29x versus 2.15x for New Jersey Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spire has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 19.91%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat Spire's return on equity of 7.51%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand Spire has an analysts' consensus of $78.89 which suggests that it could grow by 9.17%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Spire, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Spire.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 46.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spire has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.613%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Spire offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Spire pays out 72.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are smaller than Spire quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is lower than Spire's net income of $209.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while Spire's PE ratio is 17.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.29x versus 1.73x for Spire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southwest Gas Holdings has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 8.78%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat Southwest Gas Holdings's return on equity of 6.21%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand Southwest Gas Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $78.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.11%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Southwest Gas Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Southwest Gas Holdings.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.540, which suggesting that the stock is 46.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southwest Gas Holdings has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.081%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Southwest Gas Holdings offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Gas Holdings pays out 89.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are smaller than Southwest Gas Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is lower than Southwest Gas Holdings's net income of $113.9M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while Southwest Gas Holdings's PE ratio is 23.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.29x versus 1.07x for Southwest Gas Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.