MTW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astec Industries has a net margin of -1.33% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of -2.13%. Manitowoc's return on equity of -1.48% beat Astec Industries's return on equity of -0.3%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 41.48%. On the other hand Astec Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Astec Industries, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Astec Industries.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astec Industries has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.631%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Astec Industries offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 35.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Astec Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $524.8M, which are larger than Astec Industries quarterly revenues of $291.4M. Manitowoc's net income of -$7M is lower than Astec Industries's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Astec Industries's PE ratio is 39.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 0.59x for Astec Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Caterpillar has a net margin of -1.33% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 15.3%. Manitowoc's return on equity of -1.48% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 56.68%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 41.48%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $394.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.23%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.571%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $524.8M, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $16.1B. Manitowoc's net income of -$7M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 17.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 2.77x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of -1.33% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 10.24%. Manitowoc's return on equity of -1.48% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 41.48%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.19%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.033%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $524.8M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $983.8M. Manitowoc's net income of -$7M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 2.70x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of -1.33% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 7.26%. Manitowoc's return on equity of -1.48% beat Terex's return on equity of 26.74%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 41.48%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $55.45 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Terex.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.682%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Terex offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 8.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $524.8M, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Manitowoc's net income of -$7M is lower than Terex's net income of $88M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Terex's PE ratio is 6.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 0.60x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.