MSIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 88.82%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.55%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.53%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 11.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. MSC Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $8.6M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 11.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 19.60x versus 6.13x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Main Street Capital has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 83.2%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Main Street Capital's return on equity of 19.26%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Main Street Capital has an analysts' consensus of $55.75 which suggests that it could fall by -3.75%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Main Street Capital, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Main Street Capital.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Main Street Capital has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.129%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.53%. Main Street Capital offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. MSC Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital pays out 63.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Main Street Capital quarterly revenues of $139.5M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Main Street Capital's net income of $116.1M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Main Street Capital's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 19.60x versus 8.36x for Main Street Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 20.21%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 17.48%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $106.46 which suggests that it could fall by -11.88%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Northern Trust.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.06%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.53%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. MSC Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 31.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $392M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 19.60x versus 2.81x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -5.16%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat LendingTree's return on equity of -47.16%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 80.67%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.911%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.53%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $239.7M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 19.60x versus 0.48x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.