LIEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of -539.07%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's return on equity of 24.88%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.84%. Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are larger than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC quarterly revenues of -$23.6K. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is higher than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's net income of -$709.3K. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.69x while Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's PE ratio is 55.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.54x versus -- for Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Income Fund has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of 65.51%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand MSC Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.84%. MSC Income Fund offers a yield of 6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund pays out 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are smaller than MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is lower than MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.69x while MSC Income Fund's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.54x versus 13.93x for MSC Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of 23.62%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 13.79%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $91.93 which suggests that it could grow by 4.75%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than Northern Trust.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.817%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.84%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 59.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $464.9M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.69x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.54x versus 2.68x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.544%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.84%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.69x while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.54x versus -- for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.