MGM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of 3.47% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 12.3%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $45.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.78%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $51.13 which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.784, which suggesting that the stock is 78.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.402%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 22.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.56x versus 2.67x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 3.47% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 10.62%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $45.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.78%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $273.29 which suggests that it could grow by 3.59%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Marriott International, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Marriott International.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.784, which suggesting that the stock is 78.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.664%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $665M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 30.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.56x versus 2.93x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of 3.47% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 6.69%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -2.84%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $45.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.78%. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $21.31 which suggests that it could grow by 43.71%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than PENN Entertainment, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than PENN Entertainment.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.784, which suggesting that the stock is 78.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 1.816, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.55%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.7B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M is higher than PENN Entertainment's net income of $111.8M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.56x versus 0.35x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 3.47% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 4.28%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $45.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.78%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $106.41 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.784, which suggesting that the stock is 78.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.7%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of $72.7M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.56x versus 1.41x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.