MGM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 10.25%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $50.04, signalling upside risk potential of 44.05%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $59.49 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.203, which suggesting that the stock is 120.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.288%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.7B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 25.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.64x versus 3.42x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of 9.34%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $50.04, signalling upside risk potential of 44.05%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $275.44 which suggests that it could fall by -3.82%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Marriott International, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Marriott International.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.203, which suggesting that the stock is 120.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.925%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 19.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $584M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 29.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.64x versus 3.35x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of -2.24%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -16.92%.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $50.04, signalling upside risk potential of 44.05%. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $23.18 which suggests that it could grow by 27.84%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than PENN Entertainment, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than PENN Entertainment.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.203, which suggesting that the stock is 120.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 2.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.015%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.6B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M is higher than PENN Entertainment's net income of -$36.7M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.64x versus 0.44x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MGM Resorts International's net margin of -1.89%. MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

MGM Resorts International has a consensus price target of $50.04, signalling upside risk potential of 44.05%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $115.73 which suggests that it could grow by 30.36%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.203, which suggesting that the stock is 120.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.567%.

MGM Resorts International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM Resorts International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 11.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of -$32.1M. Notably, MGM Resorts International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.45x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM Resorts International is 0.64x versus 1.38x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.