LVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caesars Entertainment has a net margin of 12.3% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of -4.12%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71% beat Caesars Entertainment's return on equity of -5.31%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $51.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Caesars Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $42.93 which suggests that it could grow by 59.72%. Given that Caesars Entertainment has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe Caesars Entertainment is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 2.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.325%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Caesars Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Caesars Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Caesars Entertainment quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M is higher than Caesars Entertainment's net income of -$115M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Caesars Entertainment's PE ratio is 10.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.67x versus 0.51x for Caesars Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monarch Casino & Resort has a net margin of 12.3% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 15.84%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71% beat Monarch Casino & Resort's return on equity of 14.44%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $51.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Monarch Casino & Resort has an analysts' consensus of $88.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.09%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Monarch Casino & Resort, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Monarch Casino & Resort.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monarch Casino & Resort has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.704%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Monarch Casino & Resort offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Monarch Casino & Resort pays out 30.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Monarch Casino & Resort quarterly revenues of $125.4M. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M is higher than Monarch Casino & Resort's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Monarch Casino & Resort's PE ratio is 16.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.67x versus 3.00x for Monarch Casino & Resort. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGM Resorts International has a net margin of 12.3% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 3.47%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 17.74%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $51.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $45.82 which suggests that it could grow by 44.78%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.784, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.42%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M is higher than MGM Resorts International's net income of $148.6M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 14.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.67x versus 0.56x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 12.3% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 4.28%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $51.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $106.41 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Wynn Resorts, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Wynn Resorts.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.7%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 2.67x versus 1.41x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.