MEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Mayville Engineering's net margin of -1%. Mayville Engineering's return on equity of 9.38% beat Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23%.

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.32%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 131.73%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Mayville Engineering, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Mayville Engineering.

Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.456, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.572%.

Mayville Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mayville Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mayville Engineering quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $36.8M. Mayville Engineering's net income of $20K is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$370K. Notably, Mayville Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.35x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mayville Engineering is 0.59x versus 0.29x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Mayville Engineering's net margin of 4.33%. Mayville Engineering's return on equity of 9.38% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26%.

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.32%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 440.54%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Mayville Engineering, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Mayville Engineering.

Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.327%.

Mayville Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mayville Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mayville Engineering quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Mayville Engineering's net income of $20K is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $360K. Notably, Mayville Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.35x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mayville Engineering is 0.59x versus 0.67x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Mayville Engineering's net margin of -814.55%. Mayville Engineering's return on equity of 9.38% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.32%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mayville Engineering has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Mayville Engineering is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.701%.

Mayville Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mayville Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mayville Engineering quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Mayville Engineering's net income of $20K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Mayville Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.35x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mayville Engineering is 0.59x versus 7.99x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Mayville Engineering's net margin of -7.32%. Mayville Engineering's return on equity of 9.38% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Mayville Engineering has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.32%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 262.32%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Mayville Engineering, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Mayville Engineering.

Mayville Engineering has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.374%.

Mayville Engineering has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mayville Engineering pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mayville Engineering quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Mayville Engineering's net income of $20K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Mayville Engineering's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.35x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mayville Engineering is 0.59x versus 0.29x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.