CVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 4.33% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -1%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26% beat Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 404.73%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.3M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $36.8M. CVD Equipment's net income of $360K is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$370K. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.72x versus 0.27x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 4.33% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -814.55%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 404.73%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.3M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. CVD Equipment's net income of $360K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.72x versus 8.13x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Solutions International has a net margin of 4.33% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of 14.09%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26% beat Power Solutions International's return on equity of 184.91%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 404.73%. On the other hand Power Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.33%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.692%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Solutions International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.3M, which are smaller than Power Solutions International quarterly revenues of $135.4M. CVD Equipment's net income of $360K is lower than Power Solutions International's net income of $19.1M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.72x versus 1.73x for Power Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 4.33% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -7.32%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 404.73%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 309.11%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than SIFCO Industries, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than SIFCO Industries.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $8.3M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. CVD Equipment's net income of $360K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.72x versus 0.25x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.