MBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 4.05% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of -8.63%. MasterBrand's return on equity of 12.08% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -8.22%.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.29%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.69%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.726%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $718.1M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $83.4M. MasterBrand's net income of $29.1M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.51x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.69x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 4.05% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of 3.98%. MasterBrand's return on equity of 12.08% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46%.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.29%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.47%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.138%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $718.1M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $104M. MasterBrand's net income of $29.1M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.51x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.69x versus 0.75x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 4.05% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of -3.96%. MasterBrand's return on equity of 12.08% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.29%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.72%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Hooker Furnishings, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Hooker Furnishings.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.138%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 6.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $718.1M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. MasterBrand's net income of $29.1M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.51x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 111.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.69x versus 0.37x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands has a net margin of 4.05% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of --. MasterBrand's return on equity of 12.08% beat Regional Brands's return on equity of --.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.29%. On the other hand Regional Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Regional Brands.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.749%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $718.1M, which are larger than Regional Brands quarterly revenues of --. MasterBrand's net income of $29.1M is higher than Regional Brands's net income of --. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.51x while Regional Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.69x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.