MBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 2.01% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of 2.27%. MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of 1.48%.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.2%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.55%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.183%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $660.3M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.88x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is 64.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.56x versus 0.50x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 2.01% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of -3.28%. MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.33%.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.2%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.34%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than MasterBrand, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than MasterBrand.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.682%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $660.3M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $114M. MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.88x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 15.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.56x versus 0.50x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marwynn Holdings has a net margin of 2.01% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of --. MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97% beat Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of --.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.2%. On the other hand Marwynn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marwynn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marwynn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $660.3M, which are larger than Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues of --. MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M is higher than Marwynn Holdings's net income of --. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.88x while Marwynn Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.56x versus 2.21x for Marwynn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands has a net margin of 2.01% compared to MasterBrand's net margin of --. MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97% beat Regional Brands's return on equity of --.

MasterBrand has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.2%. On the other hand Regional Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Regional Brands.

MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.093%.

MasterBrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. MasterBrand pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand quarterly revenues are $660.3M, which are larger than Regional Brands quarterly revenues of --. MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M is higher than Regional Brands's net income of --. Notably, MasterBrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.88x while Regional Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand is 0.56x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.