LU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of -19.94% compared to Lufax Holding's net margin of --. Lufax Holding's return on equity of -3.75% beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

Lufax Holding has a consensus price target of $4.59, signalling upside risk potential of 24.28%. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lufax Holding has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe Lufax Holding is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

Lufax Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.768%.

Lufax Holding has a quarterly dividend of $2.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lufax Holding pays 161.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lufax Holding quarterly revenues are $612.8M, which are larger than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Lufax Holding's net income of -$122.2M is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Lufax Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 357.53x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lufax Holding is 0.53x versus 0.30x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -19.94% compared to Lufax Holding's net margin of 8.45%. Lufax Holding's return on equity of -3.75% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49%.

Lufax Holding has a consensus price target of $4.59, signalling upside risk potential of 24.28%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.83%. Given that Lufax Holding has higher upside potential than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe Lufax Holding is more attractive than LexinFintech Holdings.

Lufax Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.712%.

Lufax Holding has a quarterly dividend of $2.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Lufax Holding pays 161.86% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lufax Holding's is not.

Lufax Holding quarterly revenues are $612.8M, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $511.5M. Lufax Holding's net income of -$122.2M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M. Notably, Lufax Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 357.53x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 9.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lufax Holding is 0.53x versus 0.52x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qifu Technology has a net margin of -19.94% compared to Lufax Holding's net margin of 50.31%. Lufax Holding's return on equity of -3.75% beat Qifu Technology's return on equity of 24.56%.

Lufax Holding has a consensus price target of $4.59, signalling upside risk potential of 24.28%. On the other hand Qifu Technology has an analysts' consensus of $43.16 which suggests that it could grow by 13.59%. Given that Lufax Holding has higher upside potential than Qifu Technology, analysts believe Lufax Holding is more attractive than Qifu Technology.

Lufax Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.581%.

Lufax Holding has a quarterly dividend of $2.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qifu Technology offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lufax Holding pays 161.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology pays out 21.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lufax Holding's is not.

Lufax Holding quarterly revenues are $612.8M, which are larger than Qifu Technology quarterly revenues of $500.5M. Lufax Holding's net income of -$122.2M is lower than Qifu Technology's net income of $251.8M. Notably, Lufax Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 357.53x while Qifu Technology's PE ratio is 7.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lufax Holding is 0.53x versus 3.05x for Qifu Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of -19.94% compared to Lufax Holding's net margin of 17.57%. Lufax Holding's return on equity of -3.75% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Lufax Holding has a consensus price target of $4.59, signalling upside risk potential of 24.28%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.24%. Given that Lufax Holding has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding, analysts believe Lufax Holding is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding.

Lufax Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.923%.

Lufax Holding has a quarterly dividend of $2.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lufax Holding pays 161.86% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lufax Holding quarterly revenues are $612.8M, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Lufax Holding's net income of -$122.2M is lower than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Lufax Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 357.53x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 40.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lufax Holding is 0.53x versus 3.53x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.