LX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The9 has a net margin of 8.45% compared to LexinFintech Holdings's net margin of --. LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49% beat The9's return on equity of --.

LexinFintech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -31.83%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than The9.

LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.136%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LexinFintech Holdings pays 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues are $511.5M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, LexinFintech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LexinFintech Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.03x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 8.45% compared to LexinFintech Holdings's net margin of --. LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

LexinFintech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -31.83%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.

LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.03%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LexinFintech Holdings pays 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues are $511.5M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, LexinFintech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LexinFintech Holdings is 0.52x versus 3.20x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qudian has a net margin of 8.45% compared to LexinFintech Holdings's net margin of -131.8%. LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49% beat Qudian's return on equity of 0.35%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -31.83%. On the other hand Qudian has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -63.61%. Given that Qudian has more downside risk than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Qudian.

LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qudian has a beta of 0.732, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.775%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Qudian offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LexinFintech Holdings pays 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Qudian pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues are $511.5M, which are larger than Qudian quarterly revenues of $7.7M. LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M is higher than Qudian's net income of $18.4M. Notably, LexinFintech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Qudian's PE ratio is 72.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LexinFintech Holdings is 0.52x versus 18.34x for Qudian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 8.45% compared to LexinFintech Holdings's net margin of 17.57%. LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -31.83%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.24%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than LexinFintech Holdings.

LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.923%.

LexinFintech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LexinFintech Holdings pays 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues are $511.5M, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, LexinFintech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 40.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LexinFintech Holdings is 0.52x versus 3.53x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.