HBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of 8.77%. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.37%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.95%. Given that Hudbay Minerals has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.852% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.50x versus 0.86x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Royal Development has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Golden Royal Development's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.37%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals is more attractive than Golden Royal Development.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.852% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Golden Royal Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Golden Royal Development quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Golden Royal Development's net income of -$6.1K. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Golden Royal Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.50x versus -- for Golden Royal Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Metaline Contact Mines's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.37%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.852% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.699%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Metaline Contact Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines's net income of --. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Metaline Contact Mines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.50x versus -- for Metaline Contact Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.37%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 155.97%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.852% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.19x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.50x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.