GXO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 3.34%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61%.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $52.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.92%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $109.67 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher upside potential than GXO Logistics, analysts believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more attractive than GXO Logistics.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.946%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4B. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.44x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.47x versus 0.66x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 7.18%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $52.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.92%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.06%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than GXO Logistics, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than GXO Logistics.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.381%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $493.4M. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than Pitney Bowes's net income of $35.4M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.44x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.47x versus 0.83x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 1.19%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $52.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.92%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.33 which suggests that it could grow by 53.51%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than GXO Logistics, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than GXO Logistics.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.292%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.44x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 17.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.47x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volato Group has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 1.79%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat Volato Group's return on equity of --.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $52.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.92%. On the other hand Volato Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GXO Logistics has higher upside potential than Volato Group, analysts believe GXO Logistics is more attractive than Volato Group.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volato Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volato Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volato Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Volato Group quarterly revenues of $25.5M. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than Volato Group's net income of $455K. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.44x while Volato Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.47x versus 0.08x for Volato Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.