RLGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of 1.19% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 3.34%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $109.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, which suggesting that the stock is 10.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.946%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $214M, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4B. Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.97x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.33x versus 0.65x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of 1.19% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -8.26%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -158.26%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.34%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Forward Air, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Forward Air.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, which suggesting that the stock is 10.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.986%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $214M, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $613.3M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.97x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.33x versus 0.23x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 1.19% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 2.93%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.27%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.73 which suggests that it could grow by 17.73%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Hub Group.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, which suggesting that the stock is 10.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.132%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $214M, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M is lower than Hub Group's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.97x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.33x versus 0.52x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology has a net margin of 1.19% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -460.08%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09% beat Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -29.48%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 710.19%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, which suggesting that the stock is 10.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.891, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.138%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Singularity Future Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $214M, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues of $363.1K. Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M is higher than Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.97x while Singularity Future Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.33x versus 1.75x for Singularity Future Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.