GOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Escalade has a net margin of 14.13% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 4.72%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12% beat Escalade's return on equity of 8.25%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.71, signalling downside risk potential of -5.45%. On the other hand Escalade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.31%. Given that Escalade has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Escalade is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Escalade has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.711%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Escalade offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $703.4M, which are larger than Escalade quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M is higher than Escalade's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Escalade's PE ratio is 13.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.83x versus 0.77x for Escalade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 14.13% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 10.01%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.71, signalling downside risk potential of -5.45%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 24.39%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.502%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $703.4M, which are smaller than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M is lower than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.83x versus 0.63x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of 14.13% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 1.37%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -9.74%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.71, signalling downside risk potential of -5.45%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 70.65%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.555%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 5.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $703.4M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $168.3M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.83x versus 0.54x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 14.13% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 5.64%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -1.7%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.71, signalling downside risk potential of -5.45%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $36.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.41%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 16.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.548%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $703.4M, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $228.7M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.83x versus 0.83x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.