CLAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acushnet Holdings has a net margin of -8.68% compared to Clarus's net margin of 14.13%. Clarus's return on equity of -28.6% beat Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 26.12%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.30, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $67.71 which suggests that it could fall by -4.92%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Clarus has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.027%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Acushnet Holdings offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings pays out 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues of $703.4M. Clarus's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Acushnet Holdings's net income of $99.4M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Acushnet Holdings's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.53x versus 1.82x for Acushnet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of -8.68% compared to Clarus's net margin of 1.37%. Clarus's return on equity of -28.6% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -9.74%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.30, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.06%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.555%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 5.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $168.3M. Clarus's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Johnson Outdoors's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.53x versus 0.54x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of -8.68% compared to Clarus's net margin of -7.64%. Clarus's return on equity of -28.6% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.30, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $8.86 which suggests that it could grow by 43.3%. Given that Peloton Interactive has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Peloton Interactive is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.356%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $624M. Clarus's net income of -$5.2M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$47.7M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.53x versus 0.94x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of -8.68% compared to Clarus's net margin of -12.57%. Clarus's return on equity of -28.6% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -194.52%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.30, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

Clarus has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.140, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.007%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Clarus's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$411.2K. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.53x versus 0.36x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.