CLAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -32.37%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -5.38%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.94%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.93%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.158%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $105.9M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 92.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 0.60x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -0.15%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.94%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $9.13 which suggests that it could fall by -2.46%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Peloton Interactive, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Peloton Interactive.

Clarus has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 1.899, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.916%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $585.9M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$900K. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 1.29x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sacks Parente Golf has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -87.53%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Sacks Parente Golf's return on equity of -107.95%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.94%. On the other hand Sacks Parente Golf has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3409.8%. Given that Sacks Parente Golf has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Sacks Parente Golf is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sacks Parente Golf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Sacks Parente Golf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Sacks Parente Golf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are larger than Sacks Parente Golf quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Sacks Parente Golf's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Sacks Parente Golf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 0.20x for Sacks Parente Golf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -377.86%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -661.78%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.94%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

Clarus has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.283%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $361.5K. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 0.56x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.