GL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Globe Life's net margin of 10.51%. Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

Globe Life has a consensus price target of $144.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.09%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 158%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Globe Life, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Globe Life.

Globe Life has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Globe Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Globe Life pays 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Globe Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Globe Life's net income of $254.6M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Globe Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globe Life is 1.81x versus 3.16x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Globe Life's net margin of -11.55%. Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Globe Life has a consensus price target of $144.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.09%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Globe Life has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Globe Life is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Globe Life has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.474%.

Globe Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Globe Life pays 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Globe Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Globe Life's net income of $254.6M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Globe Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 6.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globe Life is 1.81x versus 0.48x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Globe Life's net margin of -2.92%. Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

Globe Life has a consensus price target of $144.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.09%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.6%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Globe Life, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Globe Life.

Globe Life has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.953%.

Globe Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Globe Life pays 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Globe Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Globe Life's net income of $254.6M is higher than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Globe Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Citizens's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globe Life is 1.81x versus 0.70x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Globe Life's net margin of 5.86%. Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 14.62%.

Globe Life has a consensus price target of $144.60, signalling upside risk potential of 19.09%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.15 which suggests that it could grow by 20.66%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Globe Life, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Globe Life.

Globe Life has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.119%.

Globe Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Globe Life pays 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Globe Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Globe Life's net income of $254.6M is higher than Unum Group's net income of $189.1M. Notably, Globe Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 9.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Globe Life is 1.81x versus 1.12x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.