GEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of -3528.43%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $76.40, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Greif.

Greif has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.70x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of --. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $76.40, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Northann.

Greif has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.70x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Packaging Corp of America has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of 9.52%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 20.21%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $76.40, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Packaging Corp of America has an analysts' consensus of $200.85 which suggests that it could fall by -1.25%. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Greif has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.432%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Packaging Corp of America offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America pays out 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Greif's net income of $47.3M is lower than Packaging Corp of America's net income of $203.8M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Packaging Corp of America's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.70x versus 2.13x for Packaging Corp of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of 2.12%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $76.40, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -3.06%. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Tesla.

Greif has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.237% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Greif's net income of $47.3M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.76x while Tesla's PE ratio is 174.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.70x versus 11.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.