FG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of -2.46% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 10.51%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 12.26% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 77.23%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than F&G Annuities & Life, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than F&G Annuities & Life.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $854M, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$21M is lower than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.48x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.86x versus 4.60x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -2.46% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of -11.55%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 12.26% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 0.95%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $854M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$21M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.48x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 7.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.86x versus 0.54x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of -2.46% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of -2.92%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 12.26% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.87%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than F&G Annuities & Life, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than F&G Annuities & Life.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.643%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $854M, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$21M is lower than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.48x while Citizens's PE ratio is 21.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.86x versus 0.77x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Financial has a net margin of -2.46% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 3.1%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 12.26% beat Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 13.14%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Fidelity National Financial has an analysts' consensus of $70.75 which suggests that it could grow by 29.18%. Given that Fidelity National Financial has higher upside potential than F&G Annuities & Life, analysts believe Fidelity National Financial is more attractive than F&G Annuities & Life.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.197%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Fidelity National Financial offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Financial pays out 41.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $854M, which are smaller than Fidelity National Financial quarterly revenues of $2.7B. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$21M is lower than Fidelity National Financial's net income of $83M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.48x while Fidelity National Financial's PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.86x versus 1.17x for Fidelity National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.