Why Did Carlos Slim Buy PBF Energy?
Carlos Slim made a splash in a surprising sector last…
Sell
23
ESE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$133.27
Seasonality move
:
6.67%
Day range:
$130.75 - $136.14
52-week range:
$96.69 - $154.00
Dividend yield:
0.24%
P/E ratio:
33.38x
P/S ratio:
3.31x
P/B ratio:
2.74x
Volume:
60.4K
Avg. volume:
96.1K
1-year change:
14.21%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$240.4M | $0.73 | 10.12% | 23.31% | $147.75 |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$91M | $0.40 | -7.91% | 400% | -- |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | -$0.05 | -- | -- | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$946.6M | $0.89 | 1.56% | 254% | $85.27 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$131.53 | $147.75 | $3.4B | 33.38x | $0.08 | 0.24% | 3.31x |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
$1.60 | -- | $23.2M | 35.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.06x |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$26.04 | -- | $492.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.43x |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
$0.20 | -- | $21.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
$6.17 | -- | $33.1M | 114.73x | $0.00 | 0% | 16.78x |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$69.71 | $85.27 | $17B | 78.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
8.98% | 1.625 | 3.67% | 1.25x |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
0.13% | -1.036 | 0.1% | 2.64x |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
21.53% | 2.652 | 19.37% | 1.52x |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | 2.553 | -- | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
-- | 0.147 | -- | 56.50x |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
23.36% | 1.952 | 11.81% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$119.7M | $51.5M | 7.67% | 8.66% | 16.77% | $57.3M |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
-$523.4K | -$1.5M | -11.92% | -11.95% | -35% | -$1.3M |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$46M | $2.2M | -1.96% | -2.49% | 2.41% | -$733K |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | -$3.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$3.3M |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
$282K | -$391K | 0.89% | 0.89% | -60.15% | $528K |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$575.6M | $118.8M | 3.06% | 4.79% | 9.96% | -- |
ESCO Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or CPSH?
CPS Technologies has a net margin of 11.48% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of -24.55%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 8.66% beat CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies40.1% $1.32 $1.4B CPSHCPS Technologies-12.32% -$0.07 $15.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.33%. On the other hand CPS Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ESCO Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe ESCO Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 CPSHCPS Technologies0 0 0 -
Is ESE or CPSH More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.997%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. CPS Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. CPS Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than CPS Technologies quarterly revenues of $4.2M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $34.3M is higher than CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.38x while CPS Technologies's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.31x versus 1.06x for CPS Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.31x 33.38x $298.5M $34.3M CPSHCPS Technologies1.06x 35.93x $4.2M -$1M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or FARO?
Faro Technologies has a net margin of 11.48% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of -0.35%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 8.66% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies40.1% $1.32 $1.4B FAROFaro Technologies55.69% -$0.02 $325.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.33%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.29%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 FAROFaro Technologies0 0 0 -
Is ESE or FARO More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.882%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.6M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $34.3M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.38x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.31x versus 1.43x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.31x 33.38x $298.5M $34.3M FAROFaro Technologies1.43x -- $82.6M -$289K
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or KNW?
Know Labs has a net margin of 11.48% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of --. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 8.66% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies40.1% $1.32 $1.4B KNWKnow Labs-- -$0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.33%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 397.02%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 KNWKnow Labs0 0 0 -
Is ESE or KNW More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. ESCO Technologies's net income of $34.3M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.38x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.31x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.31x 33.38x $298.5M $34.3M KNWKnow Labs-- -- -- -$3.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or LGL?
LGL Group has a net margin of 11.48% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 8.66% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies40.1% $1.32 $1.4B LGLLGL Group43.39% $0.01 $41M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.33%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.74%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 LGLLGL Group0 0 0 -
Is ESE or LGL More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.21%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. ESCO Technologies's net income of $34.3M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.38x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 114.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.31x versus 16.78x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.31x 33.38x $298.5M $34.3M LGLLGL Group16.78x 114.73x $650K $72K
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or TRMB?
Trimble has a net margin of 11.48% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of 4.64%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 8.66% beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies40.1% $1.32 $1.4B TRMBTrimble65.72% $0.16 $7.7B -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.33%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $85.27 which suggests that it could grow by 23.76%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 TRMBTrimble6 1 0 -
Is ESE or TRMB More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.491%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $34.3M is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.38x while Trimble's PE ratio is 78.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.31x versus 4.61x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.31x 33.38x $298.5M $34.3M TRMBTrimble4.61x 78.33x $875.8M $40.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Booking Holdings Stock Undervalued?
There is a lot of humdrum in the market about…
Broadcom vs American Express: Which Is Best?
Chip giant Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) and card company American Express…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 116x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Sell
47
DRUG alert for Jan 3
Bright Minds Biosciences [DRUG] is down 4.28% over the past day.
Buy
88
BMA alert for Jan 3
Banco Macro SA [BMA] is up 0.88% over the past day.
Sell
50
AGFY alert for Jan 3
Agrify [AGFY] is down 5.86% over the past day.
