FARO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Badger Meter has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 17.28%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Badger Meter's return on equity of 22.84%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.18%. On the other hand Badger Meter has an analysts' consensus of $237.90 which suggests that it could fall by -1.94%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Badger Meter, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Badger Meter.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.629, which suggesting that the stock is 62.86% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Badger Meter has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.533%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Badger Meter offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Meter pays out 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Meter's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are smaller than Badger Meter quarterly revenues of $222.2M. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is lower than Badger Meter's net income of $38.4M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Badger Meter's PE ratio is 53.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.49x versus 8.41x for Badger Meter. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.18%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.629, which suggesting that the stock is 62.86% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.49x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of -0.65%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.99%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.18%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.629, which suggesting that the stock is 62.86% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.267%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $918K. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is higher than LGL Group's net income of -$6K. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 99.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.49x versus 10.09x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 7.94%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Trimble's return on equity of 28.01%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.18%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $83.77 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.629, which suggesting that the stock is 62.86% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.047%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $840.6M. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is lower than Trimble's net income of $66.7M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble's PE ratio is 12.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.49x versus 5.45x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.