EPAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of -10.03%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Castellum's return on equity of -42.29%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $218.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 197.03%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.7M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.06x versus 1.41x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 12.96%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.56%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $218.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $87.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.856%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $663M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 16.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.06x versus 1.99x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F5 has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 19.91%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat F5's return on equity of 19.89%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $218.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $289.84 which suggests that it could grow by 3.3%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than F5.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.349%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than F5 quarterly revenues of $731.1M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is lower than F5's net income of $145.5M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while F5's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.06x versus 5.63x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 2.9%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $218.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 43.7%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.695%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 105.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.06x versus 2.85x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.