GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXC Technology has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 8.33%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 53.75%. On the other hand DXC Technology has an analysts' consensus of $17.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.59%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than DXC Technology, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than DXC Technology.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXC Technology has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.748%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXC Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXC Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than DXC Technology quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is lower than DXC Technology's net income of $264M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.92x while DXC Technology's PE ratio is 7.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 2.67x versus 0.23x for DXC Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 5.65%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 53.75%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $219.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.63%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.891%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is lower than EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.92x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 25.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 2.67x versus 2.12x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 7.26%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 53.75%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $260.02 which suggests that it could fall by -10.71%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.643%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.92x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 50.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 2.67x versus 4.34x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lyft has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 0.18%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat Lyft's return on equity of 8.54%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 53.75%. On the other hand Lyft has an analysts' consensus of $17.08 which suggests that it could grow by 5.51%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Lyft, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Lyft.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft has a beta of 2.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.226%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than Lyft quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is higher than Lyft's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.92x while Lyft's PE ratio is 107.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 2.67x versus 1.14x for Lyft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.