MHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of -402.57% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 11.97%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $426.09 which suggests that it could grow by 17.49%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.941%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $509M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Everest Group's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.65x versus 0.97x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -402.57% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 40.78%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.96%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.446%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.65x versus 3.67x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -402.57% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 14.9%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.37%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 4.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.65x versus 0.91x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of -402.57% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 29.8%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.52%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $294.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.7%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.003%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $4B. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.65x versus 1.02x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.