DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -17.13%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.97%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 43.48%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.506%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.64x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.74x versus 2.82x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -568.22%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.97%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.64x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.74x versus 1.91x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -2.12%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.97%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 118.66%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.64x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.74x versus 0.23x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -8.17%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.97%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 68.66%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.64x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.74x versus 2.74x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.