CW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heico has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.28%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.92%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $408.26, signalling downside risk potential of -7.42%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could fall by -12.15%. Given that Heico has more downside risk than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than Heico.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.566%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Heico offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is lower than Heico's net income of $156.8M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while Heico's PE ratio is 55.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.25x versus 8.06x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 5.72%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $408.26, signalling downside risk potential of -7.42%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.89%. Given that Sturm Ruger & has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Sturm Ruger & is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.071%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 19.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.25x versus 1.15x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of -3.51%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat VSE's return on equity of 1.56%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $408.26, signalling downside risk potential of -7.42%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $147.58 which suggests that it could grow by 13.83%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.355%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. VSE offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are larger than VSE quarterly revenues of $256M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than VSE's net income of -$9M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while VSE's PE ratio is 165.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.25x versus 2.27x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 0.8%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat V2X's return on equity of 4.12%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $408.26, signalling downside risk potential of -7.42%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $63.09 which suggests that it could grow by 39.27%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.35%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than V2X's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.23x while V2X's PE ratio is 35.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.25x versus 0.33x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.