CW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 13.91% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 9.49%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.18% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $267.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.01%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $798.9M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $111.2M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 4.51x versus 1.65x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 13.91% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 3.88%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.18% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.28%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $267.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.98%. Given that Sturm Ruger & has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Sturm Ruger & is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.333%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 229.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sturm Ruger &'s is not.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $798.9M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $122.3M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $111.2M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $4.7M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 20.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 4.51x versus 1.18x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 13.91% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 4.26%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.18% beat VSE's return on equity of 2.03%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $267.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $135.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.21%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.289%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. VSE offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $798.9M, which are larger than VSE quarterly revenues of $273.6M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $111.2M is higher than VSE's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while VSE's PE ratio is 124.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 4.51x versus 1.63x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 13.91% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 1.39%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.18% beat V2X's return on equity of 0.92%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $267.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $69.88 which suggests that it could grow by 47.42%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.389%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $798.9M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $111.2M is higher than V2X's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while V2X's PE ratio is 169.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 4.51x versus 0.36x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.