CRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 5.54%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $297.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.5%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.265%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.59x versus 0.46x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of -8.6%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $297.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.5%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 22.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.59x versus 0.52x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 15.74%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.6%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $297.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.5%. On the other hand Mueller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $110.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.52%. Given that Mueller Industries has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe Mueller Industries is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Industries has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.728%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Mueller Industries offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are smaller than Mueller Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is lower than Mueller Industries's net income of $157.4M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Mueller Industries's PE ratio is 14.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.59x versus 2.24x for Mueller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 2.85%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $297.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.5%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.45%. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.422%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.39x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 65.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.59x versus 1.96x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.