ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 6.47%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $80.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.57%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $21.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.73%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Kennametal.

ATI has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.801%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.86x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.60x versus 0.85x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 2.85%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $80.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.57%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.422%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.86x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 61.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.60x versus 1.84x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of --. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

ATI has a consensus price target of $80.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.57%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7381.3%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.628%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.86x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.60x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 2.41%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $80.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.57%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $84.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.15%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.16%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.86x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 27.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.60x versus 0.65x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.