CR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graco has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Crane's net margin of 23.54%. Crane's return on equity of 18.51% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.86%.

Crane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.55%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.64%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Graco.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.832, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.785%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Graco offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Crane pays 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $597.2M, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $519.2M. Crane's net income of $77.3M is lower than Graco's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.33x while Graco's PE ratio is 29.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.98x versus 6.85x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Crane's net margin of 11.91%. Crane's return on equity of 18.51% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

Crane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.55%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $108.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.92%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Crane pays 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $597.2M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Crane's net income of $77.3M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.33x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 45.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.98x versus 5.26x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Crane's net margin of -161.83%. Crane's return on equity of 18.51% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Crane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.55%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crane pays 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $597.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Crane's net income of $77.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.33x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.98x versus 3.58x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Crane's net margin of 14.24%. Crane's return on equity of 18.51% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

Crane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.55%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $741.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.61%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.595%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Crane pays 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $597.2M, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Crane's net income of $77.3M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.33x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.98x versus 4.26x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.