CP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSX has a net margin of 23.98% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net margin of 18.87%. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's return on equity of 8.28% beat CSX's return on equity of 25.75%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a consensus price target of $84.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.74%. On the other hand CSX has an analysts' consensus of $32.77 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that CSX has higher upside potential than Canadian Pacific Kansas City, analysts believe CSX is more attractive than Canadian Pacific Kansas City.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSX has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.446%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. CSX offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Canadian Pacific Kansas City pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. CSX pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than CSX quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net income of $632.8M is lower than CSX's net income of $646M. Notably, Canadian Pacific Kansas City's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while CSX's PE ratio is 16.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Pacific Kansas City is 6.49x versus 3.82x for CSX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norfolk Southern has a net margin of 23.98% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net margin of 25.06%. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's return on equity of 8.28% beat Norfolk Southern's return on equity of 24.36%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a consensus price target of $84.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.74%. On the other hand Norfolk Southern has an analysts' consensus of $257.44 which suggests that it could grow by 17.03%. Given that Norfolk Southern has higher upside potential than Canadian Pacific Kansas City, analysts believe Norfolk Southern is more attractive than Canadian Pacific Kansas City.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norfolk Southern has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.262%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Norfolk Southern offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Canadian Pacific Kansas City pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Norfolk Southern pays out 46.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Norfolk Southern quarterly revenues of $3B. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net income of $632.8M is lower than Norfolk Southern's net income of $750M. Notably, Canadian Pacific Kansas City's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Norfolk Southern's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Pacific Kansas City is 6.49x versus 4.11x for Norfolk Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Union Pacific has a net margin of 23.98% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net margin of 26.98%. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's return on equity of 8.28% beat Union Pacific's return on equity of 41.22%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a consensus price target of $84.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.74%. On the other hand Union Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $243.01 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that Canadian Pacific Kansas City has higher upside potential than Union Pacific, analysts believe Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more attractive than Union Pacific.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Union Pacific has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.815%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Union Pacific offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Canadian Pacific Kansas City pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Union Pacific pays out 47.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Union Pacific quarterly revenues of $6B. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net income of $632.8M is lower than Union Pacific's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Canadian Pacific Kansas City's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Union Pacific's PE ratio is 19.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Pacific Kansas City is 6.49x versus 5.35x for Union Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USD Partners LP has a net margin of 23.98% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net margin of --. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's return on equity of 8.28% beat USD Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a consensus price target of $84.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.74%. On the other hand USD Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45841.81%. Given that USD Partners LP has higher upside potential than Canadian Pacific Kansas City, analysts believe USD Partners LP is more attractive than Canadian Pacific Kansas City.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a beta of 1.085, which suggesting that the stock is 8.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USD Partners LP has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.639%.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. USD Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canadian Pacific Kansas City pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. USD Partners LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than USD Partners LP quarterly revenues of --. Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net income of $632.8M is higher than USD Partners LP's net income of --. Notably, Canadian Pacific Kansas City's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while USD Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Pacific Kansas City is 6.49x versus 0.00x for USD Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.