CARS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 2.25%. Cars.com's return on equity of 7.99% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 18.42%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $22.29, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $320.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Cars.com has a beta of 2.121, which suggesting that the stock is 112.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.217%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Cars.com's net income of $18.7M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $117.3M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.64x versus 0.30x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 6.33%. Cars.com's return on equity of 7.99% beat Openlane's return on equity of 5.43%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $22.29, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.13%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Openlane.

Cars.com has a beta of 2.121, which suggesting that the stock is 112.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.882%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $448.4M. Cars.com's net income of $18.7M is lower than Openlane's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Openlane's PE ratio is 110.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.64x versus 1.32x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Cars.com's net margin of -9.83%. Cars.com's return on equity of 7.99% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $22.29, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.72%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Cars.com has a beta of 2.121, which suggesting that the stock is 112.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.195%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Cars.com's net income of $18.7M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.64x versus 2.13x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 2.02%. Cars.com's return on equity of 7.99% beat CarMax's return on equity of 7.51%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $22.29, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $87.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.29%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than CarMax.

Cars.com has a beta of 2.121, which suggesting that the stock is 112.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.54%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Cars.com's net income of $18.7M is lower than CarMax's net income of $125.4M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while CarMax's PE ratio is 28.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.64x versus 0.51x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.