CARS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EverQuote has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 4.8%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 54.86%. On the other hand EverQuote has an analysts' consensus of $34.17 which suggests that it could grow by 40.37%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than EverQuote.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.826%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EverQuote offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EverQuote pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than EverQuote quarterly revenues of $166.6M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than EverQuote's net income of $8M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while EverQuote's PE ratio is 23.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.97x versus 1.57x for EverQuote. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Match Group has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 14.15%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Match Group's return on equity of --.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 54.86%. On the other hand Match Group has an analysts' consensus of $33.91 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Match Group, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Match Group.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Match Group has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.947%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Match Group offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Match Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are smaller than Match Group quarterly revenues of $831.2M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Match Group's net income of $117.6M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while Match Group's PE ratio is 15.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.97x versus 2.42x for Match Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TrueCar has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of -22.62%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat TrueCar's return on equity of -26.89%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 54.86%. On the other hand TrueCar has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 58.13%. Given that TrueCar has higher upside potential than Cars.com, analysts believe TrueCar is more attractive than Cars.com.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TrueCar has a beta of 2.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.298%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TrueCar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TrueCar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than TrueCar quarterly revenues of $44.8M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is higher than TrueCar's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while TrueCar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.97x versus 0.80x for TrueCar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 13.69%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 309.82%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 54.86%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 107.67%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than Cars.com, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than Cars.com.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.004%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $23.1M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.97x versus 1.85x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.