CARS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Openlane has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 8.02%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Openlane's return on equity of 9.57%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 56.51%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 0.99%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Openlane.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.45%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $460.1M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Openlane's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Openlane's PE ratio is 40.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.96x versus 1.40x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of -11.23%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 56.51%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.25%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.352%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.96x versus 3.09x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 1.5%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 56.51%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.13 which suggests that it could grow by 26.99%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than CarMax.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.380, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.989%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.96x versus 0.39x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prestige Cars International has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of --. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Prestige Cars International's return on equity of --.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 56.51%. On the other hand Prestige Cars International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Prestige Cars International, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Prestige Cars International.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, which suggesting that the stock is 83.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Cars International has a beta of 1.808, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.788%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prestige Cars International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Cars International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than Prestige Cars International quarterly revenues of --. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is higher than Prestige Cars International's net income of --. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Prestige Cars International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 0.96x versus -- for Prestige Cars International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.