EVER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cars.com has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of -1.12%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 40.89%. On the other hand Cars.com has an analysts' consensus of $16.21 which suggests that it could grow by 36.83%. Given that EverQuote has higher upside potential than Cars.com, analysts believe EverQuote is more attractive than Cars.com.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cars.com has a beta of 1.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.336%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cars.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cars.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Cars.com quarterly revenues of $179M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is higher than Cars.com's net income of -$2M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Cars.com's PE ratio is 17.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.57x versus 1.10x for Cars.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shutterstock has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 7.7%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Shutterstock's return on equity of 7.26%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 40.89%. On the other hand Shutterstock has an analysts' consensus of $26.93 which suggests that it could grow by 43.29%. Given that Shutterstock has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Shutterstock is more attractive than EverQuote.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shutterstock has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.003%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shutterstock offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shutterstock pays out 117.95% of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Shutterstock quarterly revenues of $242.6M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is lower than Shutterstock's net income of $18.7M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Shutterstock's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.57x versus 0.69x for Shutterstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 13.69%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 309.82%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 40.89%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 96.63%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than EverQuote.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.004%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are larger than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $23.1M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is higher than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.57x versus 1.96x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zillow Group has a net margin of 4.8% compared to EverQuote's net margin of 1.34%. EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32% beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -1.73%.

EverQuote has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 40.89%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $78.68 which suggests that it could grow by 15.37%. Given that EverQuote has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe EverQuote is more attractive than Zillow Group.

EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, which suggesting that the stock is 66.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.8%.

EverQuote has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EverQuote pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EverQuote quarterly revenues are $166.6M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $598M. EverQuote's net income of $8M is lower than Zillow Group's net income of $8M. Notably, EverQuote's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EverQuote is 1.57x versus 7.08x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.