BCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Imax has a net margin of 11.32% compared to BCE's net margin of 2.69%. BCE's return on equity of 2.81% beat Imax's return on equity of 6.95%.

BCE has a consensus price target of $27.28, signalling upside risk potential of 18.49%. On the other hand Imax has an analysts' consensus of $30.55 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Imax, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Imax.

BCE has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imax has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.543%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Imax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 1104.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Imax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Imax quarterly revenues of $86.7M. BCE's net income of $466.6M is higher than Imax's net income of $2.3M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.46x while Imax's PE ratio is 57.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.20x versus 4.09x for Imax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Karbon-X has a net margin of 11.32% compared to BCE's net margin of -707.05%. BCE's return on equity of 2.81% beat Karbon-X's return on equity of -209.49%.

BCE has a consensus price target of $27.28, signalling upside risk potential of 18.49%. On the other hand Karbon-X has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Karbon-X, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Karbon-X.

BCE has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karbon-X has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Karbon-X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 1104.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Karbon-X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Karbon-X quarterly revenues of $238.5K. BCE's net income of $466.6M is higher than Karbon-X's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.46x while Karbon-X's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.20x versus 47.07x for Karbon-X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lionsgate Studios has a net margin of 11.32% compared to BCE's net margin of 0.9%. BCE's return on equity of 2.81% beat Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of --.

BCE has a consensus price target of $27.28, signalling upside risk potential of 18.49%. On the other hand Lionsgate Studios has an analysts' consensus of $9.54 which suggests that it could grow by 64.49%. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than BCE, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than BCE.

BCE has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Lionsgate Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 1104.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Lionsgate Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues of $713.8M. BCE's net income of $466.6M is higher than Lionsgate Studios's net income of $6.4M. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.46x while Lionsgate Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.20x versus 0.58x for Lionsgate Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Buffet has a net margin of 11.32% compared to BCE's net margin of --. BCE's return on equity of 2.81% beat Star Buffet's return on equity of --.

BCE has a consensus price target of $27.28, signalling upside risk potential of 18.49%. On the other hand Star Buffet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BCE has higher upside potential than Star Buffet, analysts believe BCE is more attractive than Star Buffet.

BCE has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Buffet has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BCE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Star Buffet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BCE pays 1104.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Buffet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BCE quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Star Buffet quarterly revenues of --. BCE's net income of $466.6M is higher than Star Buffet's net income of --. Notably, BCE's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.46x while Star Buffet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BCE is 1.20x versus -- for Star Buffet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.