ACM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jacobs Solutions has a net margin of 4.16% compared to AECOM's net margin of -0.62%. AECOM's return on equity of 19.64% beat Jacobs Solutions's return on equity of 9.45%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $118.73, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Jacobs Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $148.99 which suggests that it could grow by 27.8%. Given that Jacobs Solutions has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe Jacobs Solutions is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Jacobs Solutions offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Jacobs Solutions pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Jacobs Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.9B. AECOM's net income of $167M is higher than Jacobs Solutions's net income of -$18.1M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Jacobs Solutions's PE ratio is 24.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.78x versus 1.42x for Jacobs Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KBR has a net margin of 4.16% compared to AECOM's net margin of 3.58%. AECOM's return on equity of 19.64% beat KBR's return on equity of 26.02%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $118.73, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand KBR has an analysts' consensus of $68.78 which suggests that it could grow by 36.74%. Given that KBR has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe KBR is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KBR has a beta of 0.732, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.82%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. KBR offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. KBR pays out 21.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than KBR quarterly revenues of $2.1B. AECOM's net income of $167M is higher than KBR's net income of $76M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while KBR's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.78x versus 0.87x for KBR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 4.16% compared to AECOM's net margin of 0.05%. AECOM's return on equity of 19.64% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity of 15.59%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $118.73, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Tetra Tech has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.65%. Given that Tetra Tech has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe Tetra Tech is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.053%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Tetra Tech offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech pays out 17.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Tetra Tech quarterly revenues of $1.4B. AECOM's net income of $167M is higher than Tetra Tech's net income of $747K. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Tetra Tech's PE ratio is 31.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.78x versus 1.50x for Tetra Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willdan Group has a net margin of 4.16% compared to AECOM's net margin of 5.34%. AECOM's return on equity of 19.64% beat Willdan Group's return on equity of 10.48%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $118.73, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Willdan Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49%. Given that Willdan Group has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe Willdan Group is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willdan Group has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.821%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Willdan Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Willdan Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Willdan Group quarterly revenues of $144.1M. AECOM's net income of $167M is higher than Willdan Group's net income of $7.7M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.49x while Willdan Group's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.78x versus 0.97x for Willdan Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.