EXPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Exponent's net margin of 6.88%. Exponent's return on equity of 25.86% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06%.

Exponent has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of $176.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Exponent has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.525%.

Exponent has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Exponent pays 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exponent quarterly revenues are $145.5M, which are smaller than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $898.3M. Exponent's net income of $26.7M is lower than FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M. Notably, Exponent's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.40x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exponent is 7.08x versus 1.61x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NV5 Global has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Exponent's net margin of 0.18%. Exponent's return on equity of 25.86% beat NV5 Global's return on equity of 3.78%.

Exponent has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20%. On the other hand NV5 Global has an analysts' consensus of $28.31 which suggests that it could grow by 46.38%. Given that NV5 Global has higher upside potential than Exponent, analysts believe NV5 Global is more attractive than Exponent.

Exponent has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NV5 Global has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.169%.

Exponent has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. NV5 Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Exponent pays 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NV5 Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exponent quarterly revenues are $145.5M, which are smaller than NV5 Global quarterly revenues of $234M. Exponent's net income of $26.7M is higher than NV5 Global's net income of $428K. Notably, Exponent's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.40x while NV5 Global's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exponent is 7.08x versus 1.26x for NV5 Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Exponent's net margin of 0.05%. Exponent's return on equity of 25.86% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity of 15.59%.

Exponent has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20%. On the other hand Tetra Tech has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than Tetra Tech, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than Tetra Tech.

Exponent has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.567%.

Exponent has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Tetra Tech offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Exponent pays 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech pays out 17.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exponent quarterly revenues are $145.5M, which are smaller than Tetra Tech quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Exponent's net income of $26.7M is higher than Tetra Tech's net income of $747K. Notably, Exponent's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.40x while Tetra Tech's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exponent is 7.08x versus 1.78x for Tetra Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willdan Group has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Exponent's net margin of 5.34%. Exponent's return on equity of 25.86% beat Willdan Group's return on equity of 10.48%.

Exponent has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20%. On the other hand Willdan Group has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.15%. Given that Willdan Group has higher upside potential than Exponent, analysts believe Willdan Group is more attractive than Exponent.

Exponent has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willdan Group has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.697%.

Exponent has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Willdan Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Exponent pays 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Willdan Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exponent quarterly revenues are $145.5M, which are larger than Willdan Group quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Exponent's net income of $26.7M is higher than Willdan Group's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Exponent's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.40x while Willdan Group's PE ratio is 26.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exponent is 7.08x versus 1.07x for Willdan Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.