INFU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Retractable Technologies has a net margin of -0.77% compared to InfuSystems Holdings's net margin of -126.59%. InfuSystems Holdings's return on equity of 5.82% beat Retractable Technologies's return on equity of -26.39%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.63, signalling upside risk potential of 123.73%. On the other hand Retractable Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that InfuSystems Holdings has higher upside potential than Retractable Technologies, analysts believe InfuSystems Holdings is more attractive than Retractable Technologies.

InfuSystems Holdings has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Retractable Technologies has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.583%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Retractable Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InfuSystems Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Retractable Technologies pays out -1.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

InfuSystems Holdings quarterly revenues are $34.7M, which are larger than Retractable Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.3M. InfuSystems Holdings's net income of -$267K is higher than Retractable Technologies's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, InfuSystems Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Retractable Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InfuSystems Holdings is 0.95x versus 0.60x for Retractable Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VolitionRX has a net margin of -0.77% compared to InfuSystems Holdings's net margin of -2201.34%. InfuSystems Holdings's return on equity of 5.82% beat VolitionRX's return on equity of --.

InfuSystems Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.63, signalling upside risk potential of 123.73%. On the other hand VolitionRX has an analysts' consensus of $2.93 which suggests that it could grow by 422.11%. Given that VolitionRX has higher upside potential than InfuSystems Holdings, analysts believe VolitionRX is more attractive than InfuSystems Holdings.

InfuSystems Holdings has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VolitionRX has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.247%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VolitionRX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InfuSystems Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VolitionRX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

InfuSystems Holdings quarterly revenues are $34.7M, which are larger than VolitionRX quarterly revenues of $246.4K. InfuSystems Holdings's net income of -$267K is higher than VolitionRX's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, InfuSystems Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while VolitionRX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InfuSystems Holdings is 0.95x versus 38.65x for VolitionRX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Catheter Precision has a net margin of -0.77% compared to InfuSystems Holdings's net margin of -2828.67%. InfuSystems Holdings's return on equity of 5.82% beat Catheter Precision's return on equity of -137.84%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.63, signalling upside risk potential of 123.73%. On the other hand Catheter Precision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 783.39%. Given that Catheter Precision has higher upside potential than InfuSystems Holdings, analysts believe Catheter Precision is more attractive than InfuSystems Holdings.

InfuSystems Holdings has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Catheter Precision has a beta of -0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.968%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Catheter Precision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InfuSystems Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Catheter Precision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

InfuSystems Holdings quarterly revenues are $34.7M, which are larger than Catheter Precision quarterly revenues of $143K. InfuSystems Holdings's net income of -$267K is higher than Catheter Precision's net income of -$4M. Notably, InfuSystems Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Catheter Precision's PE ratio is 0.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InfuSystems Holdings is 0.95x versus 2.60x for Catheter Precision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xtant Medical Holdings has a net margin of -0.77% compared to InfuSystems Holdings's net margin of 0.18%. InfuSystems Holdings's return on equity of 5.82% beat Xtant Medical Holdings's return on equity of -26.62%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.63, signalling upside risk potential of 123.73%. On the other hand Xtant Medical Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 161.19%. Given that Xtant Medical Holdings has higher upside potential than InfuSystems Holdings, analysts believe Xtant Medical Holdings is more attractive than InfuSystems Holdings.

InfuSystems Holdings has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtant Medical Holdings has a beta of -0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.091%.

InfuSystems Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xtant Medical Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InfuSystems Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtant Medical Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

InfuSystems Holdings quarterly revenues are $34.7M, which are larger than Xtant Medical Holdings quarterly revenues of $32.9M. InfuSystems Holdings's net income of -$267K is lower than Xtant Medical Holdings's net income of $58K. Notably, InfuSystems Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.50x while Xtant Medical Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InfuSystems Holdings is 0.95x versus 0.75x for Xtant Medical Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.