FSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H.B. Fuller has a net margin of -3.72% compared to Flexible Solutions International's net margin of 1.68%. Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71% beat H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 6.24%.

Flexible Solutions International has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 106.66%. On the other hand H.B. Fuller has an analysts' consensus of $60.20 which suggests that it could grow by 7.58%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.138%.

Flexible Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H.B. Fuller offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Flexible Solutions International pays 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller pays out 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues of $788.7M. Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K is lower than H.B. Fuller's net income of $13.2M. Notably, Flexible Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.19x while H.B. Fuller's PE ratio is 27.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexible Solutions International is 1.52x versus 0.89x for H.B. Fuller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -3.72% compared to Flexible Solutions International's net margin of -39.77%. Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Flexible Solutions International has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 106.66%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 44.74%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flexible Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Flexible Solutions International pays 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Flexible Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.19x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexible Solutions International is 1.52x versus 36.55x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -3.72% compared to Flexible Solutions International's net margin of --. Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Flexible Solutions International has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 106.66%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 132.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Flexible Solutions International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Flexible Solutions International.

Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

Flexible Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flexible Solutions International pays 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Flexible Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.19x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexible Solutions International is 1.52x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -3.72% compared to Flexible Solutions International's net margin of --. Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Flexible Solutions International has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 106.66%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 129.01%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Flexible Solutions International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Flexible Solutions International.

Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

Flexible Solutions International has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flexible Solutions International pays 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Flexible Solutions International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.19x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexible Solutions International is 1.52x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.