BGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of -- compared to Birks Group's net margin of -53.78%. Birks Group's return on equity of -- beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Birks Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.78%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Birks Group.

Birks Group has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.614%.

Birks Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birks Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Birks Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Birks Group's net income of -- is lower than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Birks Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birks Group is 0.14x versus 0.19x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lululemon Athletica has a net margin of -- compared to Birks Group's net margin of 13.27%. Birks Group's return on equity of -- beat Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35%.

Birks Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lululemon Athletica has an analysts' consensus of $301.63 which suggests that it could grow by 32.6%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Birks Group.

Birks Group has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.042%.

Birks Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lululemon Athletica offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birks Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lululemon Athletica pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Birks Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Birks Group's net income of -- is lower than Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M. Notably, Birks Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lululemon Athletica's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birks Group is 0.14x versus 2.59x for Lululemon Athletica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The ODP has a net margin of -- compared to Birks Group's net margin of -1.71%. Birks Group's return on equity of -- beat The ODP's return on equity of -5.33%.

Birks Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The ODP has an analysts' consensus of $29.33 which suggests that it could grow by 85.74%. Given that The ODP has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe The ODP is more attractive than Birks Group.

Birks Group has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.055%.

Birks Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birks Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Birks Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The ODP quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Birks Group's net income of -- is lower than The ODP's net income of -$29M. Notably, Birks Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The ODP's PE ratio is 23.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birks Group is 0.14x versus 0.08x for The ODP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Sports Exchange has a net margin of -- compared to Birks Group's net margin of -358.65%. Birks Group's return on equity of -- beat Pacific Sports Exchange's return on equity of --.

Birks Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Sports Exchange has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Birks Group has higher upside potential than Pacific Sports Exchange, analysts believe Birks Group is more attractive than Pacific Sports Exchange.

Birks Group has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.44% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Sports Exchange has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Birks Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Sports Exchange offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birks Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Sports Exchange pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Birks Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Sports Exchange quarterly revenues of $2K. Birks Group's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Sports Exchange's net income of -$7.2K. Notably, Birks Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacific Sports Exchange's PE ratio is 551.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birks Group is 0.14x versus 2,662.04x for Pacific Sports Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.