AMZE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MGP Ingredients has a net margin of -3469.64% compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of -2.49%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -24.31% beat MGP Ingredients's return on equity of 1.27%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGP Ingredients has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.38%. Given that MGP Ingredients has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe MGP Ingredients is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGP Ingredients has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.063%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MGP Ingredients offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGP Ingredients pays out 30.67% of its earnings as a dividend. MGP Ingredients's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.2K, which are smaller than MGP Ingredients quarterly revenues of $121.7M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is higher than MGP Ingredients's net income of -$3M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MGP Ingredients's PE ratio is 64.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 20.84x versus 0.97x for MGP Ingredients. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group has a net margin of -3469.64% compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of -480.68%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -24.31% beat Splash Beverage Group's return on equity of --.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1288.89%. Given that Splash Beverage Group has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.426%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.2K, which are smaller than Splash Beverage Group quarterly revenues of $981.9K. Amaze Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Splash Beverage Group's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Splash Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 20.84x versus 0.57x for Splash Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -3469.64% compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 0.13%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -24.31% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.57 which suggests that it could grow by 53.91%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.666%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.2K, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 25.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 20.84x versus 0.52x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willamette Valley Vineyards has a net margin of -3469.64% compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of -9.67%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -24.31% beat Willamette Valley Vineyards's return on equity of -0.46%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Willamette Valley Vineyards has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amaze Holdings has higher upside potential than Willamette Valley Vineyards, analysts believe Amaze Holdings is more attractive than Willamette Valley Vineyards.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willamette Valley Vineyards has a beta of 0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.338%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Willamette Valley Vineyards offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Willamette Valley Vineyards pays out -765.44% of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are $60.2K, which are smaller than Willamette Valley Vineyards quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Willamette Valley Vineyards's net income of -$729K. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Willamette Valley Vineyards's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 20.84x versus 0.75x for Willamette Valley Vineyards. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.