ZUMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Zumiez's net margin of 10.92%. Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 48.87%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.53%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could grow by 21.42%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Abercrombie & Fitch, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Abercrombie & Fitch.

Zumiez has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.248%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $222.5M, which are smaller than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Zumiez's net income of $1.2M is lower than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $132M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 15.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.40x versus 1.69x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Zumiez's net margin of -3.99%. Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.53%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Zumiez has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.632%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $222.5M, which are larger than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $179.1M. Zumiez's net income of $1.2M is higher than Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.40x versus 0.28x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LSEB Creative has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Zumiez's net margin of -1925.41%. Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63% beat LSEB Creative's return on equity of -254.89%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.53%. On the other hand LSEB Creative has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than LSEB Creative, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than LSEB Creative.

Zumiez has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LSEB Creative has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LSEB Creative offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LSEB Creative pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $222.5M, which are larger than LSEB Creative quarterly revenues of $2.6K. Zumiez's net income of $1.2M is higher than LSEB Creative's net income of -$49.6K. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LSEB Creative's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.40x versus 1,147.87x for LSEB Creative. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Zumiez's net margin of 7.56%. Zumiez's return on equity of -14.63% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.53%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.05%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Zumiez has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.448% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $222.5M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Zumiez's net income of $1.2M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.40x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.