WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 34.58%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 21.38%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.94, signalling upside risk potential of 59.51%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $281.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.49%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, which suggesting that the stock is 154.119% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.13300000000001%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 42.49% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $206.7M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $71.5M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 31.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 15.46x versus 10.66x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -182.06%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.94, signalling upside risk potential of 59.51%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.39%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, which suggesting that the stock is 154.119% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 58.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 15.46x versus 9.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 29.05%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.94, signalling upside risk potential of 59.51%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $83.90 which suggests that it could grow by 12.11%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, which suggesting that the stock is 154.119% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.689%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $4.8B. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 29.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 15.46x versus 7.32x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 17.53%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.94, signalling upside risk potential of 59.51%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, which suggesting that the stock is 154.119% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.05%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are larger than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is lower than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 15.46x versus 1.47x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.