WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -178.52% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 3.23%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 62.65%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $290.82 which suggests that it could fall by -19.02%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.086, which suggesting that the stock is 208.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 66.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 11.96x versus 13.74x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a net margin of -178.52% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -2.25%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95% beat Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 62.65%. On the other hand Mawson Infrastructure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 673%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.086, which suggesting that the stock is 208.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.818, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 281.83%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mawson Infrastructure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are larger than Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues of $13.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M is lower than Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mawson Infrastructure Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 11.96x versus 0.13x for Mawson Infrastructure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of -178.52% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 26.13%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 62.65%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.97 which suggests that it could fall by -11.18%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.086, which suggesting that the stock is 208.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.405%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 11.96x versus 3.77x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -178.52% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -183.64%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.86, signalling upside risk potential of 62.65%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.66%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.086, which suggesting that the stock is 208.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 11.96x versus 7.04x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.