WDFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of 4.69%. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $277.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.61%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.144, which suggesting that the stock is 85.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.749%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.87x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 17.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.00x versus 0.85x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of 4.14%. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $277.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.61%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.144, which suggesting that the stock is 85.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.87x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.00x versus 0.26x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $277.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.61%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 102.69%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.144, which suggesting that the stock is 85.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.87x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.00x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $277.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.61%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 127.27%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.144, which suggesting that the stock is 85.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.87x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.00x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.