UPWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EverQuote has a net margin of 19.58% compared to Upwork's net margin of 4.8%. Upwork's return on equity of 51.26% beat EverQuote's return on equity of 32.32%.

Upwork has a consensus price target of $19.10, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand EverQuote has an analysts' consensus of $34.17 which suggests that it could grow by 30.46%. Given that Upwork has higher upside potential than EverQuote, analysts believe Upwork is more attractive than EverQuote.

Upwork has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EverQuote has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.826%.

Upwork has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EverQuote offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upwork pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EverQuote pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upwork quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are larger than EverQuote quarterly revenues of $166.6M. Upwork's net income of $37.7M is higher than EverQuote's net income of $8M. Notably, Upwork's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while EverQuote's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upwork is 2.70x versus 1.69x for EverQuote. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinterest has a net margin of 19.58% compared to Upwork's net margin of 1.04%. Upwork's return on equity of 51.26% beat Pinterest's return on equity of 50.76%.

Upwork has a consensus price target of $19.10, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Pinterest has an analysts' consensus of $40.41 which suggests that it could grow by 16.28%. Given that Upwork has higher upside potential than Pinterest, analysts believe Upwork is more attractive than Pinterest.

Upwork has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinterest has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.725%.

Upwork has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pinterest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upwork pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pinterest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upwork quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are smaller than Pinterest quarterly revenues of $855M. Upwork's net income of $37.7M is higher than Pinterest's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Upwork's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Pinterest's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upwork is 2.70x versus 6.42x for Pinterest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of 19.58% compared to Upwork's net margin of 13.69%. Upwork's return on equity of 51.26% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 309.82%.

Upwork has a consensus price target of $19.10, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 98.26%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than Upwork, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than Upwork.

Upwork has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.004%.

Upwork has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upwork pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upwork quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are larger than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $23.1M. Upwork's net income of $37.7M is higher than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Upwork's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 13.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upwork is 2.70x versus 1.94x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zillow Group has a net margin of 19.58% compared to Upwork's net margin of 1.34%. Upwork's return on equity of 51.26% beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -1.73%.

Upwork has a consensus price target of $19.10, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $78.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.49%. Given that Upwork has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe Upwork is more attractive than Zillow Group.

Upwork has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.8%.

Upwork has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upwork pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upwork quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $598M. Upwork's net income of $37.7M is higher than Zillow Group's net income of $8M. Notably, Upwork's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.72x while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upwork is 2.70x versus 7.28x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.