TDUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Movado Group has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of 2.76%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.86%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.72%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than ThredUp, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than ThredUp.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.083%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $182.7M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $5.1M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Movado Group's PE ratio is 19.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.49x versus 0.69x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -1.28%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.86%. On the other hand Oxford Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.309%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxford Industries offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries pays out 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Oxford Industries quarterly revenues of $308M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oxford Industries's PE ratio is 89.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.49x versus 0.82x for Oxford Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -1.96%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -48.33%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.86%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.63%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Stitch Fix, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Stitch Fix.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 1.993, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.307%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $318.8M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Stitch Fix's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.49x versus 0.36x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of 12.18%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.86%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.89%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Under Armour.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.037%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Under Armour's net income of $170.4M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.49x versus 0.69x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.