Is MSTR Stock Fundamentally Misunderstood?
Software firm turned Bitcoin treasury Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) has made waves…
Buy
52
SPWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.11
Seasonality move
:
-0.6%
Day range:
$3.39 - $3.73
52-week range:
$0.92 - $3.89
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.12x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
735.5K
1-year change:
27.68%
Market cap:
$141.4M
Revenue:
$1.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings
|
$238.2M | -$0.47 | 0.98% | -27.5% | $3.20 |
|
DKS
Dick's Sporting Goods
|
$3.1B | $3.21 | 3.77% | -1.26% | $205.97 |
|
FL
Foot Locker
|
$1.9B | -$0.02 | -1.51% | 17.3% | $23.09 |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$754.2M | $0.04 | 3.13% | 287.5% | $13.50 |
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$901.9M | $0.39 | -1.44% | 18.33% | $12.00 |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$2.8B | $5.83 | 3.9% | -6.32% | $475.31 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings
|
$3.69 | $3.20 | $141.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.12x |
|
DKS
Dick's Sporting Goods
|
$184.80 | $205.97 | $14.8B | 13.22x | $1.21 | 2.44% | 1.12x |
|
FL
Foot Locker
|
$24.16 | $23.09 | $2.3B | 184.08x | $0.40 | 0% | 0.29x |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$28.55 | $13.50 | $12.8B | 62.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.44x |
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$9.16 | $12.00 | $924.2M | 5.15x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$456.97 | $475.31 | $20.5B | 17.85x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.87x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings
|
43.57% | -0.583 | 259.63% | 0.02x |
|
DKS
Dick's Sporting Goods
|
32.72% | 0.527 | 9.88% | 0.42x |
|
FL
Foot Locker
|
14.58% | 5.530 | 38.19% | 0.24x |
|
GME
GameStop
|
22.89% | 1.530 | 11.88% | 7.59x |
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
56.44% | 1.701 | 99.53% | 0.35x |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
-- | 0.698 | -- | 0.39x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings
|
$75.6M | -$19.6M | -9.43% | -15.3% | -7.87% | -$64M |
|
DKS
Dick's Sporting Goods
|
$1.2B | $379.6M | 25.83% | 38.67% | 11.34% | -$86.7M |
|
FL
Foot Locker
|
$514M | $5M | -10.95% | -12.67% | -14.94% | -$61M |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$252.8M | $24.7M | 4.74% | 5.1% | 3.37% | $189.6M |
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$458.8M | $69.4M | 11.6% | 29.87% | 7.86% | $32.2M |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$1.1B | $403.6M | 49.32% | 50.14% | 14.17% | $141M |
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPWH or DKS?
Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 8.33%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings30.37% -$0.56 $381.1M DKSDick's Sporting Goods36.7% $3.24 $4.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SPWH or DKS?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling downside risk potential of -13.28%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $205.97 which suggests that it could grow by 11.45%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings3 1 0 DKSDick's Sporting Goods8 15 0 -
Is SPWH or DKS More Risky?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.122%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPWH or DKS?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPWH or DKS?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.12x versus 1.12x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings0.12x -- $249.1M -$21.3M DKSDick's Sporting Goods1.12x 13.22x $3.2B $264.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SPWH or FL?
Foot Locker has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -20.23%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -12.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings30.37% -$0.56 $381.1M FLFoot Locker28.65% -$3.81 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SPWH or FL?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling downside risk potential of -13.28%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $23.09 which suggests that it could fall by -4.42%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has more downside risk than Foot Locker, analysts believe Foot Locker is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings3 1 0 FLFoot Locker0 14 0 -
Is SPWH or FL More Risky?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.233%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPWH or FL?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPWH or FL?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$363M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 184.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.12x versus 0.29x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings0.12x -- $249.1M -$21.3M FLFoot Locker0.29x 184.08x $1.8B -$363M
-
Which has Higher Returns SPWH or GME?
GameStop has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 6.12%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat GameStop's return on equity of 5.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings30.37% -$0.56 $381.1M GMEGameStop34.52% $0.09 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SPWH or GME?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling downside risk potential of -13.28%. On the other hand GameStop has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could fall by -52.72%. Given that GameStop has more downside risk than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than GameStop.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings3 1 0 GMEGameStop0 0 1 -
Is SPWH or GME More Risky?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameStop has a beta of -0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.845%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPWH or GME?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GameStop offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GameStop pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPWH or GME?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than GameStop quarterly revenues of $732.4M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than GameStop's net income of $44.8M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GameStop's PE ratio is 62.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.12x versus 3.44x for GameStop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings0.12x -- $249.1M -$21.3M GMEGameStop3.44x 62.07x $732.4M $44.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns SPWH or SBH?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 4.44%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings30.37% -$0.56 $381.1M SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.95% $0.38 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SPWH or SBH?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling downside risk potential of -13.28%. On the other hand Sally Beauty Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings3 1 0 SBHSally Beauty Holdings2 2 1 -
Is SPWH or SBH More Risky?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPWH or SBH?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sally Beauty Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sally Beauty Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPWH or SBH?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues of $883.1M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $39.2M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sally Beauty Holdings's PE ratio is 5.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.12x versus 0.26x for Sally Beauty Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings0.12x -- $249.1M -$21.3M SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.26x 5.15x $883.1M $39.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SPWH or ULTA?
Ulta Beauty has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 10.71%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings30.37% -$0.56 $381.1M ULTAUlta Beauty39.12% $6.70 $2.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SPWH or ULTA?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling downside risk potential of -13.28%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $475.31 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings3 1 0 ULTAUlta Beauty9 13 1 -
Is SPWH or ULTA More Risky?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.798%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPWH or ULTA?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPWH or ULTA?
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 17.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.12x versus 1.87x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPWHSportsman's Warehouse Holdings0.12x -- $249.1M -$21.3M ULTAUlta Beauty1.87x 17.85x $2.8B $305.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet or Amazon the Better Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) are two of the mega-cap…
Why Did Ken Griffin Buy Sweetgreen Stock?
In Q1, Ken Griffin’s Citadel Advisors purchased nearly 1.3 million…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
73
OKLO alert for Jun 12
Oklo [OKLO] is down 5.6% over the past day.
Buy
87
SMR alert for Jun 12
NuScale Power [SMR] is down 2.96% over the past day.
Buy
53
PLAY alert for Jun 12
Dave & Buster's Entertainment [PLAY] is up 0.69% over the past day.
