SPSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 12.23% compared to SPS Commerce's net margin of 24.04%. SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.18% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $179.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $311.94 which suggests that it could fall by -4.18%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

SPS Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. SPS Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPS Commerce quarterly revenues are $181.5M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. SPS Commerce's net income of $22.2M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, SPS Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.78x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPS Commerce is 7.98x versus 6.99x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 12.23% compared to SPS Commerce's net margin of 9.31%. SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.18% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $179.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.76%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Autodesk.

SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

SPS Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPS Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPS Commerce quarterly revenues are $181.5M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. SPS Commerce's net income of $22.2M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, SPS Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.78x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 63.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPS Commerce is 7.98x versus 10.11x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 12.23% compared to SPS Commerce's net margin of 5.29%. SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.18% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 9.12%.

SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $179.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $116.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Agilysys.

SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.051%.

SPS Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPS Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPS Commerce quarterly revenues are $181.5M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $74.3M. SPS Commerce's net income of $22.2M is higher than Agilysys's net income of $3.9M. Notably, SPS Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.78x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 127.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPS Commerce is 7.98x versus 10.85x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 12.23% compared to SPS Commerce's net margin of -4.72%. SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.18% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $179.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 267.37%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SPS Commerce, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SPS Commerce.

SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.862% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

SPS Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPS Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPS Commerce quarterly revenues are $181.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. SPS Commerce's net income of $22.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, SPS Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.78x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPS Commerce is 7.98x versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.