RRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 13.64%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 77.8% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 29.04%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $63.63, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming has an analysts' consensus of $76.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.75%. Given that Red Rock Resorts has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Red Rock Resorts is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.417%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Boyd Gaming offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 33.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 10.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues of $961.2M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $29M is lower than Boyd Gaming's net income of $131.1M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Boyd Gaming's PE ratio is 13.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.25x versus 1.81x for Boyd Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -26.81%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 77.8% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $63.63, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 35.15%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.771%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 33.29% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $29M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.25x versus 4.01x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -11.19%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 77.8% beat Full House Resorts's return on equity of -59.04%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $63.63, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Full House Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 56.49%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.783%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Full House Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 33.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $468M, which are larger than Full House Resorts quarterly revenues of $75.7M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $29M is higher than Full House Resorts's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Full House Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.25x versus 0.49x for Full House Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 3.21%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 77.8% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 7.09%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $63.63, signalling upside risk potential of 27.35%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $36.63 which suggests that it could grow by 16.68%. Given that Red Rock Resorts has higher upside potential than Golden Entertainment, analysts believe Red Rock Resorts is more attractive than Golden Entertainment.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 2.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.221%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.17%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 33.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 22.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $468M, which are larger than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $161.2M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $29M is higher than Golden Entertainment's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 25.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.25x versus 1.29x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.